Timeline for Should I ferment a new batch directly on the yeast cake generated by the previous batch?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
17 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 17, 2015 at 15:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackHomebrew/status/677509147307466753 | ||
| Dec 11, 2015 at 11:00 | answer | added | Myke Dowson | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 15, 2011 at 16:51 | history | edited | Rich Armstrong | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 44 characters in body
|
| S Jun 24, 2011 at 12:48 | history | suggested | kathryn |
Added a tag to differentiate between beer questions and wine questions
|
|
| Jun 24, 2011 at 3:06 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 24, 2011 at 12:48 | |||||
| Jun 11, 2011 at 1:01 | comment | added | brewchez | For a better experiment though I'd rather try it with the same beer twice. Make an English Pale ale of 1050 OG with an estuary yeast. Pitch from a traditional starter for the first beer. Then rebrew the same recipe and use the whole cake. Then compare them side by side. I might try that actually. | |
| Jun 10, 2011 at 17:57 | history | edited | Rich Armstrong | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 810 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Dec 1, 2010 at 21:52 | history | edited | Rich Armstrong | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added 644 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Apr 14, 2010 at 15:51 | history | edited | hookedonwinter |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 10, 2010 at 7:12 | answer | added | Joe | timeline score: 0 | |
| Mar 26, 2010 at 18:38 | vote | accept | Rich Armstrong | ||
| Mar 26, 2010 at 13:38 | history | edited | brewchez |
edited tags
|
|
| Mar 26, 2010 at 13:36 | answer | added | brewchez | timeline score: 9 | |
| Mar 25, 2010 at 19:49 | vote | accept | Rich Armstrong | ||
| Mar 26, 2010 at 18:38 | |||||
| Mar 25, 2010 at 16:36 | answer | added | Angelos | timeline score: 3 | |
| Mar 25, 2010 at 16:06 | history | edited | Rich Armstrong | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
edited title
|
| Mar 25, 2010 at 15:56 | history | asked | Rich Armstrong | CC BY-SA 2.5 |