Timeline for Any reason not to lower a hydrometer into my secondary?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 8, 2012 at 20:08 | comment | added | bk0 | By definition gravity should be stable in secondary. Otherwise it isn't a secondary. | |
| May 8, 2012 at 18:45 | comment | added | mdma | the question is about secondary - no krausen nor churning. | |
| May 8, 2012 at 18:41 | comment | added | Denny Conn | But why do you need a hydrometer reading every time you look at it? Leave it there for the months you're talking about and then check it. | |
| May 8, 2012 at 18:04 | comment | added | alex.jordan | Right, but that's why I'd be doing this in the secondary. My secondaries usually start with only a thin (1mm?) layer of bubbles and then become placid. Even if the bubbles are actually krausen foam, what about waiting until the surface is placid? | |
| May 8, 2012 at 17:39 | history | undeleted | Denny Conn | ||
| May 8, 2012 at 16:29 | history | deleted | bk0 | ||
| May 8, 2012 at 16:29 | history | answered | bk0 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |