Skip to main content

Timeline for 90-minute boil for pilsner malt?

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

10 events
when toggle format what by license comment
S Feb 23, 2016 at 12:17 history suggested FredrikH-R CC BY-SA 3.0
added celsius
Feb 23, 2016 at 8:05 review Suggested edits
S Feb 23, 2016 at 12:17
Jun 7, 2011 at 7:45 comment added zgoda Another point to reduce DMS probability - quickly chill wort down to below 80*C, because the SMM->DMS conversion requires temperatures above 80*C. And 60' boil can be sufficient, but there is too much risk.
Mar 7, 2011 at 16:58 comment added JasonStoltz Would the same apply if you are using Pilsner Malt Extract? Maybe a silly question, but I'm still a learner... EDIT: nm, just found answer elsewhere, the answer is NO, it does not apply to malt exract.
Nov 26, 2010 at 16:29 vote accept Jeff Roe
Nov 26, 2010 at 16:29 comment added Jeff Roe This is great info to have! It's interesting that John Palmer's How to Brew doesn't seem to mention this. He's got recipes in there using all pilsner malt and, unless I've missed something, he just specifies a 60-minute boil.
Nov 26, 2010 at 15:22 comment added brewchez I agree you probably can get away with a 60 minute boil if its really aggressive. Far more aggressive than with my normal boil. And if you boil that hard, would might likely darken the delicate pilsner wort more than you want right?
Nov 26, 2010 at 13:46 comment added sgwill No, with Pilsner malt you really do need 90 minutes with a rolling boil. As brewchez said, it has far more DMS precursor than a regular 2-row.
Nov 26, 2010 at 7:46 comment added arnemart This. If you have a good rolling boil you can probably get away with 60-70 minutes, but it doesn't hurt to play it safe :-) It's also important to cool the wort quickly, as DMS is produced above a certain temperature threshold, and only evaporates when the wort is boiling.
Nov 25, 2010 at 22:59 history answered brewchez CC BY-SA 2.5