Skip to main content
6 events
when toggle format what by license comment
May 23, 2012 at 2:35 comment added David PGB Okay! Good criticism! As I mentioned that has been my experience in the past, but you all make good points and I completely about primary fermentation and the use of a hydrometer. I brewed many, many kits before taking brewing seriously and I certainly found the above fermentation schedule to be adequate for those kits, however I agree that having and properly using a hydrometer is very essential to good quality brewing.
May 23, 2012 at 1:06 history edited brewchez CC BY-SA 3.0
edited body
May 23, 2012 at 0:59 comment added bk0 It is more-or-less true that with extract kits you don't strictly NEED a hydrometer--as long as you follow directions you will hit the target OG within a point or two and the FG will be whatever it will be. Not upvoting because of the recommendation for 7 day primary and secondary...secondaries are not necessary and racking after a week is too soon.
May 22, 2012 at 14:47 comment added CaffeCaldo Homebrewing without a hydrometer is like driving a car without a speedometer: you can probably get by without one, until you run into one of those unfortunate situations where you wish you had one. ;-) (It's the difference between the gut feel "I think this is so" vs the more scientific "I know this is so".)
May 22, 2012 at 14:18 comment added mdma bit of a harsh downvote - although I don't recommend it, you CAN get by without a hydrometer if you have to with a kit, and only a few years ago many brewers used to rack to secondary as par for the course without spoiling the beer.
May 22, 2012 at 13:51 history answered David PGB CC BY-SA 3.0